Regional Transp. Comm'n. of S. Nev. v. Dist. Ct. (Wang)

persuaded that petitioners have met their burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991); see also Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (noting that this court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. ,C.J. Hardesty J. Douglas cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division Mainor Wirth G. Dallas Horton & Associates Henness & Haight Edward M. Bernstein & Associates/Las Vegas Callister & Associates Golightly & Vannah, PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A