TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00281-CR
Pedro P. Morales, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. C-10-0321-SB, HONORABLE MARTIN (BROCK) JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Pedro P. Morales was charged with intoxicated assault with a motor vehicle
causing serious bodily injury, a third degree felony. Tex. Penal Code § 49.07. The trial court found
Morales guilty and assessed his punishment at ten years’ confinement in the Institutional Division
of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, along with payment of a fine and restitution. The trial
court, however, suspended Morales’s sentence and placed him on probation for ten years. The State
later moved to revoke Morales’s probation based on seven violations of his probation. After a bench
trial, the trial court found all seven of the State’s allegations true and revoked Morales’s probation.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a
brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there
are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 86–87 (1988).
Appellant’s counsel has represented to the Court that he has provided copies of the
motion and the brief to the appellant; advised the appellant of his right to examine the appellate
record and file a pro se brief; and provided the appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the
appellate record along with the mailing address of this Court. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,
319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766.
We have not received a pro se brief from the appellant.
We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate
counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d
at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel
that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________
Scott K. Field, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field
Affirmed
Filed: December 2, 2015
Do Not Publish
2
Pedro P. Morales v. State
Combined Opinion