Filed 12/4/15 P. v. Lopez CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE,
F069873
Plaintiff and Respondent,
(Super. Ct. No. CRM012561A)
v.
ISAAC ESPINOSA LOPEZ, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. Donald J.
Proietti, Judge.
Solomon Wollack, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and
Respondent.
-ooOoo-
When he was 15 years old, Issac Espinosa Lopez1 shot and killed Tommy Henson,
and shot and wounded Tommy’s father, Randy Henson, in a drive by shooting. He
* Before Levy, Acting P.J., Gomes, J. and Poochigian, J.
eventually accepted a plea agreement and was sentenced to the agreed-upon term of
imprisonment.2 After reviewing the file, appellate counsel could not identify any
arguable issues. Our review of the file has led us to the same conclusion. Accordingly,
we affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The information charged Lopez with (1) murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)),3
(2) attempted murder (§§ 187, subd. (a) and 664), (3) assault with a semi-automatic
firearm (§ 245, subd. (b)), (4) shooting at an inhabited dwelling (§ 246), and (5) active
participation in a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (a)). The murder count included
the special circumstance allegation that the murder was committed while Lopez and the
co-defendant, Sanson Andrade, were active participants in a criminal street gang.
(§ 190.2, subd. (a)(22).) Numerous enhancements were also charged including
(1) personal discharge of a firearm resulting in the death of a person (§ 12022.53,
subds. (d) and (e)(1) - counts 1, 2, and 4), (2) the commission of the crime was for the
benefit of a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b) - counts 1, 2 , 3 and 4), (3) personal
use of a firearm (§ 12022.5 – counts 1, 2, 3 and 4), and (4) personal infliction of great
bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (a) – counts 3 and 4).
The testimony at the preliminary hearing established that Lopez and Andrade were
related by marriage, and were both gang members. They both told police officers they
were driving around Dos Palos looking for rival gang members to confront when they
saw the victims in front of a house. Lopez got out of the vehicle and fired twice in the
1 The appellate brief lists the defendant’s name as Issac Lopez Espinosa. The trial
court made a finding that his name is Issac Espinosa Lopez. Consistent with this finding,
we will refer to the defendant as Lopez.
2 By the time he was sentenced Lopez was no longer a minor.
3 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated.
2.
direction of the victims, apparently hitting each victim one time. The two victims were
Randy Henson and his son, Tommy Henson. Tommy Henson died from his wounds.
The trial of the two defendants was severed, with Andrade being tried first. Prior
to his trial, Lopez entered into a plea agreement which required him to plead no contest to
the second degree murder of Tommy Henson, assault with a semi-automatic firearm
where the victim was Randy Henson, and admit the section 12022.5, subdivision (a)
enhancement on the assault count. Lopez agreed to a prison term of 15 years to life on
the murder count, and consecutive aggravated terms of nine years for the assault and 10
years for the firearm enhancement. The trial court adequately informed Lopez of his
constitutional and statutory rights, and obtained a waiver of those rights.
Thereafter the trial court sentenced Lopez to the agreed-upon term. Lopez filed a
notice of appeal which did not contain a request for a certificate of probable cause,
instead stating the appeal was from the sentencing or post plea matters.
DISCUSSION
Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436
asserting he did not identify any arguable issues in this case. We invited Lopez to inform
us of any issues he would like us to address by letter dated November 26, 2014. Lopez
did not respond to our invitation.
We have reviewed the record and have not identified any arguable issues in this
case. Lopez confessed to the crime shortly after committing the murder. He accepted a
plea bargain that resulted in dismissal of numerous charges and enhancements. He was
thoroughly advised of his trial rights and waived those rights. The sentence imposed
provides a likelihood Lopez will eventually be paroled if he is deemed suitable, thereby
protecting his constitutional rights. (Miller v. Alabama (2012) 567 U.S. ___ [132 S.Ct.
2455, 2469].)
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
3.