In response, appellants argue that the order appealed from
was the final judgment because it resolved respondents' cause of action for
attorney fees and determined that they were the prevailing party entitled
to such fees. We disagree. Because the order appealed from did not
establish an amount of fees, but instead set a future hearing date to
determine an appropriate amount of fees, the order is not appealable.'
Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 2
1C241)Wr .
Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Leon Aberasturi, District Judge
Laurie A. Yott, Settlement Judge
Leverty & Associates Law, Chtd.
Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd.
Third District Court Clerk
Supreme Court Law Librarian
IWe note that appellants have filed an appeal from the district
court's order awarding a specific amount of fees and costs, docketed in this
court as Docket No. 68776. Appellants are free to raise issues regarding
respondents' entitlement to fees in the context of that appeal.
2 Appellants' motion to consolidate this appeal with Docket No.
68776 is denied as moot. The conditional sanction imposed against
appellants' counsel is hereby vacated.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1547A