implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing against Carnoso, Inc.
Thus, even if the claim was resolved as against Landry's, Inc., appellants
fail to demonstrate that the claim was resolved as against Carnoso, Inc.
Accordingly, we conclude that the amended judgment does not resolve all
claims asserted in the district court and is not a final judgment appealable
under NRAP 3A(b)(1), see Lee v. GNLV, Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416
(2000) (defining a final judgment as one that "disposes of all the issues
presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of
the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and
costs"); see also Reno Hilton Resort Corp. v. Verderber, 121 Nev. 1, 106
P.3d 134 (2005) (concluding that NRAP 3A(b)(2) does not permit an appeal
from an interlocutory order denying a motion for a new trial), and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
atkr
Parraguirre
Chszy
t
Douglas Cherry
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
Janet Trost, Settlement Judge
Greenberg Traurig, LLP/Las Vegas
Joseph Y. Hong
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A Fe