UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2163
BANK OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
FLORINE BEESON; HENRY BEESON,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-02926-RMG)
Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 21, 2015
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Florine Beeson, Henry Beeson, Appellants Pro Se. William Price
Stork, BROCK & SCOTT, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
The Appellants, Florine and Henry Beeson, removed their
state foreclosure action to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1446 (2012). The district court adopted the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and remanded the case back to state court
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1447(c) (2012). Appellants seek to appeal that order and the
Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.
The district court’s order of remand is not reviewable by
this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012); see also E.D. ex
rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722 F.3d 574, 579 (4th Cir. 2013)
(section 1447(d) prohibits review of all remand orders pursuant
to § 1447(c) “regardless of ‘whether or not that order might be
deemed erroneous by [us].’” (quoting Thermtron Prods. v.
Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 351 (1976)). Accordingly, we grant
the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal and deny the
Appellants’ motions for injunctive relief pending appeal,
default judgment, and emergency relief. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid in the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2