In Re: Discipline of Andrew Taylor

bar counsel updating his place of employment, areas of practice, caseload, restitution payments, and any issues that may have developed; (5) take and pass the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE) within one year after the plea is approved; and (6) pay the actual costs of the disciplinary proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries. Considering the duties violated, Taylor's mental state, the injury caused by Taylor's misconduct, the aggravating factors (dishonest or selfish motive, a pattern of misconduct, multiple offenses, vulnerability of the victim, and substantial experience in the law), and mitigating factors (absence of prior disciplinary record, timely good faith effort to make restitution or rectify consequences, full and free disclosure to disciplinary authority or cooperative attitude, delay in disciplinary proceedings in relation to the misconduct, and remorse), see In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246, 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008), the agreed-upon discipline recommended by the hearing panel is sufficient to serve the purpose of attorney discipline State Bar of Nev. v. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115, 213, 756 P.2d 464, 527-28 (1988) (observing that the purpose of attorney discipline is to protect the public, the courts, and the legal profession, not to punish the attorney). We therefore conclude that the guilty plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1). We hereby impose an 18-month stayed suspension, a 120-day actual suspension, and a 2-year probationary period commencing from the date of this order. Taylor must comply with all of the conditions in the plea agreement, as outlined above, and shall pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries, within 30 days from the date of this order. The parties shall comply with the SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 KO 1947A cte0 relevant provisions of SCR 115 and 121.1 It is so ORDERED. , C.J. J. Parraguirre Che Gibbons 1/4 N-g- 6) DOUGLAS, SAITTA, and PICKERING, JJ., dissenting: We would reject the conditional guilty plea agreement because the agreed-upon discipline is not sufficient. In our view, an actual suspension of at least six months is appropriate considering the relevant factors. J. Douglas Saitta SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A e cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Lipson Neilson Cole Seltzer & Garin, P.C. Stan Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) I.947A 4g4.