FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 27 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SALVADOR PEREZ-GUZMAN, No. 14-72439
Petitioner, Agency No. A047-721-744
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 20, 2016**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Salvador Perez-Guzman, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400
F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Perez-Guzman’s motion to
reopen as untimely where it was filed more than two years after the final order of
removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and he failed to show a change in country
conditions in Mexico sufficiently material to him in order to warrant reopening, see
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii), Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 996 (9th Cir. 2007)
(setting forth the requirements for prevailing on a motion to reopen due to changed
country conditions).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 14-72439