Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Appellant v. SANDISK CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________ 2015-1630 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,384. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WENYE TAN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU. DARRYL J. ADAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, ar- gued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. OAKS; RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court