Netac Technology Co., Ltd. v. Sandisk Corporation

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

         NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,
                  Appellant

                           v.

             SANDISK CORPORATION,
                      Appellee
               ______________________

                      2015-1630
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,384.
                  ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   WENYE TAN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA,
argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU.

   DARRYL J. ADAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, ar-
gued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. OAKS;
RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
    PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA,
Circuit Judges).
          AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                     ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


February 9, 2016                /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
      Date                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                                Clerk of Court