John Mack, Jr. v. John Burgess

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7380 JOHN WILLIE MACK, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN DAVID BURGESS, Spartanburg City Police, In his Individual and Official Capacities; GEORGE DAVID REEVES, Custodian of Evidence For the Spartanburg City Police Department, In His Individual and Official Capacities; MANUEL J. ORTUNO, Forensics Analyst of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, In His Individual and Official Capacities; ANTHONY C. LEIBERT, Solicitor and State Attorney for Spartanburg County/City, In His Individual and Official Capacities; BARRY JOE BARNETTE, Solicitor and State Attorney for Spartanburg County/City, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. (9:15-cv-02128-DCN) Submitted: January 27, 2016 Decided: February 9, 2016 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Willie Mack, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: John Willie Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mack v. Burgess, No. 9:15-cv-02128-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ We conclude that the district court’s order is final and appealable. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015). 3