IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RUBEN PAUL PEREZ, A/K/A ENRIQUE No. 68254
ROCHA PEREZ,
Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
FILED
FEB 10 2016
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a
petition for a writ of mandamus. 1 Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark
County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.
In his petition, appellant requested that the district court
assign a "special master" to search the court's archives for his sentencing
transcripts to determine whether his written judgment of conviction
contains a clerical error. Appellant fails to demonstrate that the district
court abused its discretion by denying his petition. See Kay v. Nunez, 122
Nev. 1100, 1105, 146 P.3d 801, 805 (2006) ("When reviewing a district
court order resolving a petition for mandamus relief, this court considers
whether the district court has abused its discretion."); see generally
1 Thisappeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument,
NRAP 34(0(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review
and additional briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev.
681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A ,7(11Sc))4
Bradley v. State, 109 Nev. 1090, 1095, 864 P.2d 1272, 1275 (1993)
(discussing the effect of an oral sentence pronouncement). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
Parraguirre Dougla
CHERRY, J., concurring:
I concur.
CL
Cherry
J.
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge
Ruben Paul Perez
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
2We have received the document appellant submitted on October 19,
2015, and conclude that no relief is warranted based upon this submission.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e