IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
UNITED ROAD TOWING, INC., D/B/A No. 69538
QUALITY TOWING; AND CITY
TOWING, INC., D/B/A QUALITY
TOWING,
FILE
Petitioners, FEB 1 2 2016
vs.
i E
.„ K. LINDEMAN
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CL
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, BY 011141',
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK;
AND THE HONORABLE RONALD J.
ISRAEL, DISTRICT JUDGE,
Respondents,
and
FIRST SERVICE CREDIT UNION,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION
This original petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition
challenges the district court's jurisdiction to consider an action alleging
violations of NRS Chapter 706's tow car provisions.
Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we
conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. NRS
34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193,
197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120
Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004) (stating that an appeal is
generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief and recognizing
that petitioner bears the burden to demonstrate that writ relief is
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A 444D)r/
-
warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818
P.24 849, 851 (1991). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.'
, C.J.
Parraguirre
J.
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge
Arias Sanguinetti Stahle Torrijos
Toschi, Sidran, Collins, and Doyle
Brooks Hubley LLP
Winston & Strawn LLP/Chicago
Attorney GenerallLas Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
'Writs of mandamus and prohibition will issue only upon application
of the party beneficially interested, based on affidavit. See NRS 34.170;
NRS 34.330. Petitioners' failure to provide such an affidavit is an
alternative basis on which to deny this writ petition. NRAP 21(a)(5).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A