State v. Crabb

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. No. 34,472 5 TAYLOR CRABB, 6 Defendant-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TORRANCE COUNTY 8 Mercedes C. Murphy, District Judge 9 Hector Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Plaintiff-Appellee 12 Taylor Crabb 13 Hobbs, NM 14 Pro Se Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 VIGIL, Chief Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. 4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 _______________________________ 6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8 ___________________________________ 9 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 10 _________________________________ 11 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 2