Coughlin, A. v. Massaquoi, U.

J-A33002-15 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ANN COUGHLIN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS COUGHLIN, : PENNSYLVANIA DECEASED : : Appellant : : v. : : UMMU MASSAQUOI : No. 3367 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment Entered January 26, 2015, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No. July Term, 2013 No. 0355 BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., STABILE and STRASSBURGER, JJ.* CONCURRING STATEMENT BY: STRASSBURGER, J.:FILED FEBRUARY 23, 2016 I agree with the Majority’s conclusion that the expert testimony presented at trial was sufficient corroborating evidence to permit admission of the decedent’s BAC; thus, the trial court did not abuse its discretion. I write separately to note that Coughlin’s reliance on Clinton v. Giles, 719 A.2d 314 (Pa. Super. 1998), is misplaced. Following this Court’s recent decision in Braun v. Target Corp., 983 A.2d 752 (Pa. Super. 2009), which relied upon Gallagher v. Ing, 532 A.2d 1179 (Pa. 1987) to affirm the admission of intoxication evidence corroborated by expert testimony, this Court’s contrary determination in Clinton is no longer good law. Judge Stabile joined the concurring statement. *Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.