United States v. Ramon Lemus-Perdomo

Case: 15-40946 Document: 00513411004 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-40946 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 8, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAMON DARIO LEMUS-PERDOMO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14-CR-667-1 Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ramon Dario Lemus-Perdomo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lemus-Perdomo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lemus-Perdomo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 15-40946 Document: 00513411004 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2016 No. 15-40946 appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Lemus-Perdomo’s incorporated motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED. 2