UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1026
In re: RONALD MCCLARY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:15-ct-03259-D; 5:15-ct-03230-D;
5:15-ct-03219-BO; 3:15-cv-00020-FDW)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald McClary, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald McClary petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an
order directing the district court to identify the cases listed on
the North Carolina Department of Public Safety’s Trust Fund Account
Statement. We conclude that McClary is not entitled to mandamus
relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only
in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426
U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509,
516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available
only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought.
In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.
1988).
Because McClary has not shown a clear right to the relief
sought, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2