People v. Scott CA3

Filed 4/19/16 P. v. Scott CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (San Joaquin) ---- THE PEOPLE, C079756 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SF119692B) v. CHARLES SCOTT, Defendant and Appellant. This is an appeal pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). In July 2014, defendant Charles Scott was convicted of elder abuse and placed on probation. In June 2015, defendant (who was representing himself) objected to the transfer of his probation to Butte County. Defendant also challenged the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction and moved to have his case dismissed accordingly. The trial court advised defendant that it had subject matter jurisdiction and ordered defendant to begin counseling as required by his probation, and begin to pay on the order for restitution. 1 In July 2015, the trial court found defendant in compliance with the terms of his probation. Defendant agreed to the transfer and the court ordered his probation transferred to Butte County. Defendant appeals. We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed on opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. DISPOSITION The order of the trial court is affirmed. HULL , J. We concur: RAYE , P. J. NICHOLSON , J. 2