IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 941 MAL 2015
:
Respondent :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from
: the Order of the Superior Court
v. :
:
:
QU'EED BATTS, :
:
Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issues raised by Petitioner:
1. In Miller v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed mandatory life
without parole for juveniles (LWOP), and instructed that the discretionary
imposition of this sentence should be "uncommon" and reserved for the
"rare juvenile offender whose crime reflects irreparable corruption."
i. There is currently no procedural mechanism to ensure that
juvenile LWOP will be "uncommon" in Pennsylvania. Should
this Court exercise its authority under the Pennsylvania
Constitution to promulgate procedural safeguards including
(a) a presumption against juvenile LWOP; (b) a requirement
for competent expert testimony; and (c) a "beyond a
reasonable doubt" standard of proof?
ii. The lower court reviewed the Petitioner's sentence under
the customary abuse of discretion standard. Should the
Court reverse the lower court's application of this highly
deferential standard in light of Miller?
2. In Miller, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that the basis for its
individualized sentencing requirement was Graham's comparison of
juvenile LWOP to the death penalty. The Petitioner received objectively
less procedural due process than an adult facing capital punishment.
Should the Court address the constitutionality of the Petitioner's
resentencing proceeding?
The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED with respect to Petitioner’s third stated
issue.
[941 MAL 2015] - 2