Order filed April 19, 2016.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-14-00865-CV
____________
CORESLAB STRUCTURES (TEXAS), INC., Appellant
V.
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 55th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2010-55665A
ORDER
An original clerk’s record was filed in this appeal on December 3, 2014. A first
supplemental clerk’s record was filed on March 20, 2015. A second supplemental clerk’s
record was filed on October 1, 2015. Our review has determined that relevant items have
been omitted from the clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not
contain any of the following:
An Attorney’s Fees Affidavit, which is Exhibit G (Filed Under Seal pursuant to
Protective Order) to the Affidavit of C. Scott Kinzel, which is Exhibit N to
Coreslab’s First Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on Damages, filed in the
trial court on April 11, 2014.
Plavnicky Kinzel & Makowski LLP Invoices, which are Exhibit H (Filed Under
Seal) to the Affidavit of C. Scott Kinzel, which is Exhibit N to Coreslab’s First
Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on Damages, filed in the trial court on
April 11, 2014.
An Attorney’s Fees Affidavit, which is Exhibit G (Filed Under Seal pursuant to
Protective Order) to the Amended Affidavit of C. Scott Kinzel, which is Exhibit N
to Coreslab Structures (Texas), Inc.’s Response to Scottsdale’s Motion for
Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment on Damages, filed
in the trial court on September 8, 2014.
Plavnicky Kinzel & Makowski LLP Invoices, which are Exhibit H (Filed Under
Seal) to the Amended Affidavit of C. Scott Kinzel, which is Exhibit N to Coreslab
Structures (Texas), Inc.’s Response to Scottsdale’s Motion for Summary Judgment
and Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment on Damages, filed in the trial court on
September 8, 2014.
Exhibit P to Coreslab Structures (Texas), Inc.’s Response to Scottsdale’s Motion
for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment on Damages,
filed in the trial court on September 8, 2014.
Exhibit Q to Coreslab Structures (Texas), Inc.’s Response to Scottsdale’s Motion
for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment on Damages,
filed in the trial court on September 8, 2014.
Exhibit R to Coreslab Structures (Texas), Inc.’s Response to Scottsdale’s Motion
for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment on Damages,
filed in the trial court on September 8, 2014.
Exhibit S to Coreslab Structures (Texas), Inc.’s Response to Scottsdale’s Motion
for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment on Damages,
filed in the trial court on September 8, 2014.
Exhibit T to Coreslab Structures (Texas), Inc.’s Response to Scottsdale’s Motion
for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment on Damages,
filed in the trial court on September 8, 2014.
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file each of the items listed above, if
the item is contained in the trial court’s case file, in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals on or
before April 29, 2016. The items, if any, that were filed under seal in the trial court should
be filed under seal with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in a supplemental clerk’s record
under seal. The items, if any, that were not filed under seal in the trial court should be filed
with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in a supplemental clerk’s record that is not under
seal. If one or more of the omitted items are not part of the trial court’s case file, the district
clerk is directed to file in a supplemental clerk’s record that is not under seal a certified
statement that the omitted item(s) is not a part of the trial court’s case file.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.