Arriba v. Bank of America, N.A.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA EVA ARRIBA, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 69026 Appellant, vs. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC FILED HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP F/K/A COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS MAY 1 1 2016 SERVICING, LP, A NATIONAL CLERK K. LINDEMAN CLERK OP SUPREME COURT BANKING ASSOCIATION, DEPUTY CLER. Respondent. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order granting a motion for summary judgment in an action for interpleader and related claims. When our initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be• dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, it appeared that the district court had not entered a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because the interpleader claim remained pending in the district court. In response, appellant concedes that the interpleader action remains unresolved but asserts that the challenged order resolves all of the issues between the parties to this appeal. Because the interpleader claim remains pending in the district court and the district court did not certify its order as final pursuant to NRCP 54(b) 1 the order is not 1-We express no opinion as to whether any such certification would be proper. See NRCP 54(b); MaIlin u. Farmers Ins. Exch., 106 Nev. 606, 797 P.2d 978 (1990). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 10) 1947A appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED J. cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge Janet Trost, Settlement Judge The Wright Law Group Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (Op 1947A 0