UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1377
ROBERT B. HOLT, individually; DORIS HOLT, Estate of Doris
Holt by and through Robert B. Holt, sole beneficiary,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
SUSAN STROMAN; PRINCESS HODGES; SUSAN TILLMAN; KATHY BEERS;
JENNIFER BREWTON; UNIHEALTH POST ACUTE CARE OF COLUMBIA;
LATOYA BUGGS-WILLIAMS; SGT. DARIN L. DOUGHERTY; SGT.
GEORGE A. DRAFTS; COLUMBIA POLICE DEPARTMENT; ANDRE BAUER;
KEN ARD; BETH SCHULER; CRYSTAL PAVLICK; PALMETTO HEALTH;
PALMETTO SENIOR CARE; UHS-PRUITT CORPORATION; LT. COL. CARL
BURKE; BRENDA HODGES; PAMELA DANZLER; UNIHEALTH ORANGEBURG
SC; APRIL MERILL; JAYSON BRING,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SOUTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
SOCIAL SERVICES; BRENDA HUGHES, individually and in her
official capacity as Administrator with UniHealth; SC
OFFICE ON AGING, THE; CERTAIN UNKNOWN JOHN DOES, in their
individual and official capacities; SOUTH CAROLINA
OMBUDSMAN'S OFFICE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-03539-JMC)
Submitted: March 18, 2016 Decided: May 17, 2016
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael G. Sribnick, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellants.
Andrew F. Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South
Carolina; Eugene H. Matthews, C. Cliff Rollins, RICHARDSON
PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; James E.
Parham, Jr., JAMES E. PARHAM, JR., P.A., Irmo, South Carolina;
J. Edward Bradley, John C. Bradley, Jr., MOORE TAYLOR LAW FIRM,
P.A., W. Columbia, South Carolina; Tyler L. Arnold, W. Jerad
Rissler, ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Jeanne J.
Lisowski, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert B. Holt appeals the district court’s order
dismissing the first amended complaint without prejudice for
failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holt v.
Stroman, No. 3:12-cv-03539-JMC (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3