IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-83,576-01
EX PARTE CHARLES HIRSCH, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. F-2007-1760-A WHC 1 IN THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM DENTON COUNTY
Per curiam. RICHARDSON , J., filed a dissenting statement in which JOHNSON and
ALCALA , JJ., joined. NEWELL, J., would grant.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of
online solicitation of a minor and sentenced to 180 days’ imprisonment on each count. The Second
Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Hirsch v. State, 282 S.W.3d 196 (Tex. App.—Fort
Worth 2009).
In a single ground, Applicant contends that his convictions are no longer valid in light of Ex
parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). We decline to review the merits of this ground.
2
Under Article 11.07, confinement “means confinement for any offense or any collateral consequence
resulting from the conviction that is the basis of the instant habeas corpus.” TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC.
art. 11.07, § 3(c); see also Ex parte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452, 457 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).
Applicant’s sentences have discharged, and he has not alleged collateral consequences. This
application is dismissed without prejudice.
Filed: May 25, 2016
Do not publish