Case: 15-13567 Date Filed: 05/27/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-13567
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01533-SDM-JSS
SAGO NETWORKS, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
AMERICAN INFOAGE, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
REGIONS BANK,
an Alabama banking corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 27, 2016)
Case: 15-13567 Date Filed: 05/27/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HUCK,∗ District
Judge.
PER CURIAM:
American Infoage, LLC, brought this lawsuit against Regions Bank after
Regions imposed a “swap breakage fee” under the parties’ written swap
agreements. Infoage asserted claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach
of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealings, and
unjust enrichment. The district court granted partial summary judgment to
Regions with respect to some of the claims and, after a bench trial, entered
judgment in favor of Regions on the rest of the claims. This is Infoage’s appeal. 1
After reviewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm the
district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Regions, which was
filed on September 25, 2014, as well as its judgment in favor of Regions based on
its thorough and well-reasoned findings of fact and conclusions of law filed on July
9, 2015.
AFFIRMED. 2
∗
Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the Southern District of
Florida, sitting by designation.
1
The district court also entered judgment against another plaintiff, Sago Networks, LLC,
on an unrelated claim and Sago appealed. In a previous order, this Court granted Sago’s motion
to voluntarily dismiss its appeal.
2
This case was originally scheduled for oral argument but was removed from the oral
argument calendar by unanimous consent of the panel under 11th Circuit Rule 34-3(f).
2