In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-16-00174-CR
TONJE HUNT, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 137th District Court
Lubbock County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2015-406,498, Honorable John J. "Trey" McClendon III, Presiding
May 31, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
Appellant, Tonje Hunt, appearing pro se, seeks to appeal a plea-bargained
judgment of conviction for the offense of possession with intent to deliver a controlled
substance, cocaine, in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams.1 In
accordance with the terms of the plea bargain, appellant was sentenced to ten years
confinement. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we will dismiss.
1
TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112(a), (d) (West 2010).
An appeal must be dismissed unless a trial court’s certification showing that the
defendant has the right of appeal has been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(d). Here, the Trial Court’s Certification of the Defendant’s Right to Appeal
indicates that this was “a plea-bargain case and the Defendant has NO right of appeal.”
Based upon our review of the record, we find that appellant voluntarily, knowingly, and
intelligently entered into a plea bargain and that the terms of this plea bargain were
accepted by the trial court. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App.
2005).
By letter dated May 3, 2016, we notified appellant that the trial court’s certification
showed that this was a plea-bargain case for which appellant had no right of appeal.
We advised appellant that the appeal must be dismissed unless an amended
certification reflecting that appellant has the right of appeal is received or appellant can
demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal by May 24, 2016. Although
appellant filed a response, she did not file an amended certification and her response
did not demonstrate that this Court has jurisdiction.
Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
2