FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUN 06 2016
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-30103
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00059-RSL-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SHAWN LUNDY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Robert S. Lasnik, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 2, 2016**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Shawn Lundy appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
guilty-plea convictions and 10-year sentence for conspiracy to distribute heroin, in
violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846, and possession of
counterfeit obligations or securities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. Pursuant to
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lundy’s counsel has filed a brief
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel. We have provided Lundy the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Lundy has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because
the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we
dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.
2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2