North, James Christopher

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-84,239-02 EX PARTE JAMES CHRISTOPHER NORTH, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 09790-D(2) IN THE 350TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TAYLOR COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to seventy years’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. North v. State, No. 11-11-00338-CR (Tex. App. — Eastland, January 24, 2014) (not designated for publication). Applicant contends, among other things,1 that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance 1 This Court has considered Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit. 2 because trial counsel failed to present evidence during the guilt/innocence stage regarding Applicant’s 1986 traumatic brain injury and its effect on Applicant’s ability to form the requisite mens rea. Although evidence of the brain injury was presented during the punishment stage, Applicant alleges that trial counsel should have presented evidence and expert testimony at the guilt/innocence stage to negate the intent element of the offense. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all 3 affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: June 8, 2016 Do not publish