Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No.
Opinion Delivered June 23, 2016
IN RE ARKANSAS RULES OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, RULE
1.5
PER CURIAM
The Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct is recommending that the
court amend Rule 1.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. We publish the proposal for
comment. Comments should be made in writing before September 1, 2016, and they should
be addressed to: Stacey Pectol, Clerk, Supreme Court of Arkansas, Attention: Professional
Conduct, Rule 1.5, Justice Building, 625 Marshall Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201.
Proposed changes are set out in “line-in, line-out” fashion (new material is
underlined; deleted material is lined through).
Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct
Rule 1.5. Fees.
(a) A lawyer's fee shall be reasonable. A lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge,
or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses. The factors to be
considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following:
(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved,
and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly;
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
(2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular
employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer;
(3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;
(4) the amount involved and the results obtained;
(5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances;
(6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client;
(7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the
services; and
(8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.
(b)(1) The scope of the representation and the basis or rate of the fee and expenses for
which the client will be responsible shall be communicated to the client, preferably in
writing, before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation, except
when the lawyer will charge a regularly represented client on the same basis or rate. Any
changes in the basis or rate of the fee or expenses shall also be communicated to the client.
(2) Any agreement between a lawyer and a client likely to result in a total fee in
excess of $1,000.00, or any agreement for a retainer in excess of $1,000.00, shall be
confirmed in writing and shall state the method by which any sums due to the lawyer will
be calculated.
(c) A fee may be contingent on the outcome of the matter for which the service is
rendered, except in a matter in which a contingent fee is prohibited by paragraph (d) or
2
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
other law. A contingent fee agreement shall be in writing and shall state the method by
which the fee is to be determined, including the percentage or percentages that shall accrue
to the lawyer in the event of settlement, trial or appeal, litigation and other expenses to be
deducted from the recovery, and whether such expenses are to be deducted before or after
the contingent fee is calculated. The agreement must clearly notify the client of any expenses
for which the client will be liable whether or not the client is the prevailing party. Upon
conclusion of a contingent fee matter, the lawyer shall provide the client with a written
statement stating the outcome of the matter and, if there is a recovery, showing the
remittance to the client and the method of its determination.
(d) A lawyer shall not enter into an arrangement for, charge, or collect:
(1) any fee in a domestic relations matter, the payment or amount of which is
contingent upon the securing of a divorce or upon the amount of alimony or support, or
property settlement in lieu thereof. Provided, however, after a final order or decree is
entered a lawyer may enter into a contingent fee contract for collection of payments which
are due pursuant to such decree or order; or
(2) a contingent fee for representing a defendant in a criminal case.
(e) A division of fee between lawyers who are not in the same firm may be made only
if:
(1) the division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer or, by
written agreement with the client, each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the
3
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
representation;
(2) the client is advised of and does not object to the participation of all the lawyers
involved; and
(3) the total fee is reasonable.
(f) In the absence of a written agreement to the contrary, any payment of funds from a
client to a lawyer shall be presumed to be an advance payment of fees or costs, to be earned
or expended in the future, and shall be maintained in the lawyer’s client trust account, until
earned or expended.
COMMENT
Reasonableness of Fee and Expenses
[1A] This rule is designed to prohibit only unreasonably high fees and is not to be construed
as prohibiting free services, reduced fees or pro bono legal services.
[1] Paragraph (a) requires that lawyers charge fees that are reasonable under the
circumstances. The factors specified in (1) through (8) are not exclusive. Nor will each factor
be relevant in each instance. Paragraph (a) also requires that expenses for which the client
will be charged must be reasonable. A lawyer may seek reimbursement for the cost of
services performed in-house, such as copying, or for other expenses incurred in-house, such
as telephone charges, either by charging a reasonable amount to which the client has agreed
in advance or by charging an amount that reasonably reflects the cost incurred by the lawyer.
4
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
Basis or Rate of Fee
[2] When the lawyer has regularly represented a client, they ordinarily will have evolved an
understanding concerning the basis or rate of the fee and the expenses for which the client
will be responsible. In a new client-lawyer relationship, however, an understanding as to
fees and expenses must be promptly established. Generally, it is desirable to furnish the client
with at least a simple memorandum or copy of the lawyer's customary fee arrangements that
states the general nature of the legal services to be provided, the basis, rate or total amount
of the fee and whether and to what extent the client will be responsible for any costs,
expenses or disbursements in the course of the representation. A written statement
concerning the fee terms of the engagement reduces the possibility of misunderstanding.
[3] Contingent fees, like any other fees, are subject to the reasonableness standard of
paragraph (a) of this Rule. In determining whether a particular contingent fee is reasonable,
or whether it is reasonable to charge any form of contingent fee, a lawyer must consider the
factors that are relevant under the circumstances. Applicable law may impose limitations on
contingent fees, such as a ceiling on the percentage allowable, or may require a lawyer to
offer clients an alternative basis for the fee. When there is doubt whether a contingent fee
is consistent with the client's best interest, the lawyer should offer the client alternative bases
for the fee and explain their implications, Applicable law also may apply to situations other
than a contingent fee, for example, government regulations regarding fees in certain tax
matters.
5
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
Terms of Payment
[4] A lawyer may require advance payment of a fee, but is obliged to return any unearned
portion. See Rule 1.16(d). A “general” retainer securing only the attorney’s availability in
the future is fully-earned and generally non-refundable if so designated in a writing signed
by the attorney and the client at the time of the payment of such fee, and any such fee is
not to be placed into a client trust account. A lawyer may accept property in payment for
services, such as an ownership interest in an enterprise, providing this does not involve
acquisition of a proprietary interest in the cause of action or subject matter of the litigation
contrary to Rule 1.8(I). However, a fee paid in property instead of money may be subject
to the requirements of Rule 1.8(a) because such fees often have the essential qualities of a
business transaction with the client.
[5] An agreement may not be made whose terms might induce the lawyer improperly to
curtail services for the client or perform them in a way contrary to the client's interest. For
example, a lawyer should not enter into an agreement whereby services are to be provided
only up to a stated amount when it is foreseeable that more extensive services probably will
be required, unless the situation is adequately explained to the client. Otherwise, the client
might have to bargain for further assistance in the midst of a proceeding or transaction.
However, it is proper to define the extent of services in light of the client's ability to pay. A
lawyer should not exploit a fee arrangement based primarily on hourly charges by using
wasteful procedures.
6
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
Prohibited Contingent Fees
[6] Paragraph (d) prohibits a lawyer from charging a contingent fee in a domestic relations
matter when payment is contingent upon the securing of a divorce or upon the amount of
alimony or support or property settlement to be obtained. This provision does not preclude
a contract for a contingent fee for legal representation in connection with the recovery of
post-judgment balances due under support, alimony or other financial orders because such
contracts do not implicate the same policy concerns.
Division of Fee
[7] A division of fee is a single billing to a client covering the fee of two or more lawyers
who are not in the same firm. A division of fee facilitates association of more than one
lawyer in a matter in which neither alone could serve the client as well, and most often is
used when the fee is contingent and the division is between a referring lawyer and a trial
specialist. Paragraph (e) permits the lawyers to divide a fee either on the basis of the
proportion of services they render or if each lawyer assumes responsibility for the
representation as a whole. In addition, the client must agree to the association of other
counsel, and the agreement must be confirmed in writing. Contingent fee agreements must
be in a writing signed by the client and must otherwise comply with paragraph (c) of this
Rule. Joint responsibility for the representation entails financial and ethical responsibility for
the representation as if the lawyers were associated in a partnership. A lawyer should only
refer a matter to a lawyer whom the referring lawyer reasonably believes is competent to
7
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
handle the matter. See Rule 1.1.
[8] Paragraph (e) does not prohibit or regulate division of fees to be received in the future
for work done when lawyers were previously associated in a law firm.
Disputes over Fees
[9] If a procedure has been established for resolution of fee disputes, such as an arbitration
or mediation procedure established by the bar, the lawyer must comply with the procedure
when it is mandatory, and, even when it is voluntary, the lawyer should conscientiously
consider submitting to it. Law may prescribe a procedure for determining a lawyer's fee, for
example, in representation of an executor or administrator, a class or a person entitled to a
reasonable fee as part of the measure of damages. The lawyer entitled to such a fee and a
lawyer representing another party concerned with the fee should comply with the prescribed
procedure.
Writing Requirement for Flat Fee, Fixed Fee, or Retainer Agreements
[10] Subsection (b)(2) provides a specific rule requiring that agreements for a total fee likely
to exceed $1,000.00, or any agreement for a retainer in excess of $1,000.00, shall be
confirmed in writing.
Further, if the client may later be determined to owe any additional sums to the lawyer, the
writing must state the method by which those additional sums will be calculated. This
writing should be provided to the client as early as possible in order to avoid any
misunderstanding and preferably would have been signed by the client at or near the
8
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
inception of the representation.
[11] There are many different types of “retainer” fee agreements, depending on the
intentions of the lawyer and the client. In general, lawyers and clients often use the
following types of retainer agreements:
1. “General” or engagement retainer: This agreement is a payment only for the future
“availability” of the lawyer during a given period of time. Such payments are not for any
specific legal services rendered or to be rendered to the client, and are fully earned upon
receipt by the lawyer. Such payments should not be deposited into any trust account, as
the funds no longer belong to the client and are generally not refundable.
2. “Advanced” fee retainer or security retainer: This retainer is a fee received by the
lawyer in advance of legal services being performed in a matter, and can be a flat fee, fixed
fee, one for hourly billing, or otherwise. Advanced fees are deposited into and maintained
in a trust account until earned. Such retainers are refundable until earned, and the written
engagement agreement should clearly indicate the circumstances in which such funds
become the property of the lawyer. Upon the occurrence of such circumstance, the funds
are earned and should be promptly removed from the lawyer’s trust account to avoid
“commingling.”
3. Flat fee or fixed fee: This fee is an advance payment retainer or fee for a fixed
charge for legal services that is a complete and maximum payment and does not vary with
the amount of time or effort required by the attorney to complete the legal services required
9
Cite as 2016 Ark. 286
in the matter. Such a fee shall be deposited into the lawyer’s trust account and maintained
there until earned. The lawyer and client may agree in a writing signed by the client that
the funds become the property of the lawyer immediately upon engagement. In that event,
the funds must not be deposited into the lawyer’s trust account.
4. “Non-refundable” retainers or fees: A retainer or fee that is treated by the attorney
as “non-refundable” shall be clearly so labeled and explained in a writing signed by the client
at the inception of the relationship. Any such retainer or fee is subject to the general
reasonableness standard of Rule 1.5(a), the requirement in Rule 1.16(d) that the fee be
earned, and must also be consistent with public policy.
Presumption
[12] Subsection (f) provides a presumption that all payments from a client to a lawyer
constitute the advance payment of fees or costs, and so must be maintained in the lawyer’s
trust account. The presumption does not apply when there is a writing signed by the client
which states otherwise, such as an engagement letter, or other written fee agreement.
10