IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-16-00180-CR
JOSE FRANCISCO ESCAMILLA,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 66th District Court
Hill County, Texas
Trial Court No. 38,991
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Jose Francisco Escamilla appeals from the trial court’s interlocutory
order denying his motion to suppress. The denial of a motion to suppress may not be
appealed until after the final judgment is entered. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161
(Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1991) (“The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders
unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.”). Accordingly, we dismiss
this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed June 22, 2016
Do not publish
[CR25]
Escamilla v. State Page 2