U.S. Bank Nat'l. Ass'n. v. Rjrn Holdings, LLC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, No. 69457 AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, ASSET-BACKED PASS- FILED THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES JUN 2 7 2016 2005-HE3; AND NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, A ci.Ep.g..5.,LatmEEmia,„ FOREIGN CORPORATION, BY CHIEF CEPIPTCL Appellants, vs. RJRN HOLDINGS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Respondent. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a November 5, 2015, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, and from a December 10, 2015, judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; James Crockett, Judge. When our initial review of the docketing statement revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we ordered appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, it was not clear whether the counterclaims against Spring Mountain Ranch Master Association and Nevada Association Services or the counterclaim for unjust enrichment were resolved such that the district court order or judgment was appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV, Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000). In response to our order, appellant has submitted a copy of a stipulation resolving the counterclaims against Spring Mountain Ranch Master Association and Nevada Association Services. Appellants also SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A kip - 7aff) assert that the counterclaim for unjust enrichment was dismissed in the November 5, 2015, findings of fact and conclusions of law. But that order did not resolve the unjust enrichment claim. Instead, it granted respondent's motion for summary judgment, which did not request summary judgment with respect to thefl unjust enrichment claim, and denied appellants' motion for summary judgment and request for a continuance. Accordingly, appellants fail to demonstrate that the counterclaim for unjust enrichment was resolved in the district court and thus that the challenged order and judgment are appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1). We conclude that we lack jurisdiction and ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. Hardesty Saitta A defIA. Cup Pickering J. cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas The Law Office of Mike Beede, PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2