This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before
publication in the New York Reports.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 118
The People &c.,
Respondent,
v.
Nadine Panton,
Appellant.
Robin Nichinsky, for appellant.
David P. Stromes, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that police engaged in improper
pre-Miranda custodial interrogation and as a result, her
post-Miranda written and video statements should have been
suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular
- 1 -
- 2 - No. 118
ground in either her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is
unpreserved for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887,
888 [1982]).
We have considered defendant's remaining contention and
find it to be without merit.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges
Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided June 30, 2016
- 2 -