The People v. Nadine Panton

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 118 The People &c., Respondent, v. Nadine Panton, Appellant. Robin Nichinsky, for appellant. David P. Stromes, for respondent. MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre-Miranda custodial interrogation and as a result, her post-Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular - 1 - - 2 - No. 118 ground in either her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpreserved for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]). We have considered defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur. Decided June 30, 2016 - 2 -