United States v. Tapia

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51145 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTURO TAPIA, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-00-CR-569-2 -------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Arturo Tapia appeals his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine. Tapia argues that 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a) and (b) were rendered facially unconstitutional by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). Tapia concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our opinion in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 581-82 (5th Cir. 2000)(revised opinion), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1045 (2001), which rejected a broad * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-51145 -2- Apprendi-based attack on the constitutionality of that statute. He raises the issue only to preserve it for Supreme Court review. A panel of this court cannot overrule a prior panel’s decision in the absence of an intervening contrary or superseding decision by this court sitting en banc or by the United States Supreme Court. Burge v. Parish of St. Tammany, 187 F.3d 452, 466 (5th Cir. 1999). No such decision overruling Slaughter exists. Accordingly, Tapia’s argument is foreclosed. Appellant has moved for permission to file a pro se supplemental brief. The motion is DENIED. AFFIRMED.