Defendant was convicted on a charge of carnal knowledge of a girl over 12 and under 16 years of age, and he appeals.
We have examined this record and each exception. There is no prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Defendant was convicted on a charge of carnal knowledge of a girl over 12 and under 16 years of age, and he appeals.
We have examined this record and each exception. There is no prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.