Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still. There is sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and there is no prejudicial error in any rulings of the trial court on the evidence.
The judgment is affirmed.
Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still. There is sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and there is no prejudicial error in any rulings of the trial court on the evidence.
The judgment is affirmed.