I concur in the opinion, except in its holding that the apportionment of the expense of the bridge is a matter on the border line between the judicial and administrative power.
I am of the opinion that the apportionment of the expense of the bridge in its subject-matter is judicial in its nature and in no sense administrative, and, therefore, the appeal from the order making such apportionment brings up the matter for a hearing de novo. *Page 480