[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
The plaintiff now claims in this appeal that payment of these amounts places him below the minimum support guidelines. The court need not reach the legal issue because the plaintiff is factually incorrect. The original $48 per week order was based upon a finding of a $235 per week earning capacity on September 8, 1997. No modification of this finding or order has since entered. Therefore the plaintiff is left with $165.38 per week for self support which is $20 per week over the minimum self support reserve. Additionally no financial information was offered by the plaintiff at the hearing before the magistrate. CT Page 12984
The appeal is dismissed.
Zarella, J.