United States v. Hogle

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 5, 2004 FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51072 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GREGORY WALTER HOGLE, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (W-02-CR-61-1) Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed appellate counsel for defendant Gregory Walter Hogle has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hogle has filed a pro se response brief, but he fails to identify any nonfrivolous appellant issues. Our independent review of the briefs and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. excused from further responsibilities; and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED