Cravatt v. Pierson

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be reversed while Mr. Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that said judgment should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 So.2d Rep. 380, and State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 So.2d Rep. 796. Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91, Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. ___.

An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.

All concur. *Page 936