I cannot concur in the conclusion of the majority in this case. I was disqualified from participating *Page 285 in the Marathon Sav. Bank case, and I have never concurred in the rule therein announced. I think it is wrong; that it imports a section from the general statute on receivers into the banking law, where it never was intended to be, and where it was wholly inapplicable. The Marathon Sav. Bank case should be overruled now, and I dissent because this opinion reaffirms it.