United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 17, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-40308
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODOLFO GAMBOA, also known as Rudy Gamboa,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-03-CR-1-1
--------------------
Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rodolfo Gamboa appeals the district court’s revocation of
his supervised release. He argues that revocation was error
because it was based on unreliable and conflicting hearsay
information that he had assaulted his wife.
The district court did not err in revoking Gamboa’s
supervised release. United States v. Alaniz-Alaniz, 38 F.3d 788,
792 (5th Cir. 1994). There was sufficiently reliable evidence in
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-40308
-2-
the form of the police report, the assault victim’s statement,
and the testimony of the probation officer to support the
district court’s determination that Gamboa assaulted his wife.
Id. at 791 & n.8. The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.