Perl v. Cohodas, Peterson, Paoli, Nast Co.

Under the evidence, medical and lay, I am of the opinion the verdict awarding plaintiff damages to the amount of $12,484 was grossly excessive, and for this reason the trial court should have granted defendant's motion for new trial instead of requiring plaintiff to remit only $2,484.

The judgment should be reversed, with a new trial and with costs to defendant.

The late Justice POTTER took no part in this decision. *Page 340