United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 22, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-11226
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE SANTOS PEREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:03-CR-235-ALL
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Santos Perez (Perez) appeals the sentence he received
on his guilty-plea convictions of conspiracy to possess stolen
mail and possession of stolen mail. We AFFIRM.
Perez’s sole contention is that the district court clearly
erred by enhancing his sentence on the ground that there were
more than 50 victims of his offenses. Section 2B1.1(b)(2)(B) of
the Sentencing Guidelines authorizes a four-level increase in a
defendant’s offense level if that occurred.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-11226
-2-
The district court based its finding on the presentence
report and testimony of a Secret Service special agent that more
than 150 government checks were stolen and some 71 check-cashers
and other endorsers were victimized during the conspiracy of
which Perez was a leader. This evidence was plausible and
uncontradicted by any defense evidence. Thus the district
court’s finding was not clearly erroneous, and Perez’s sentence
must be affirmed. See United States v. Young, 981 F.2d 180, 185
(5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.