Personally, I adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in the recent case of State v. Holt et al., Mont.,194 P.2d 651, at pages 667-677, but am bound by and subscribe to the doctrine of stare decisis and the pronouncement of the majority of this court in the Holt case, supra, which since such pronouncement has become and is the law of this state governing the case now before us, for which reasons alone I concur.