United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-30946
K. TRACY BERGQUIST,
ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHER
SHAREHOLDERS OF FyBX CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
FyBX CORPORATION; MICHAEL P. ARATA;
HOFFMAN, SIEGEL, SEYDEL, BIENVENU, CENTOLA & CORDES,
A PROFESSIONAL LAW FIRM; BORDELON, HAMLIN AND THERIOT,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 02-CV-722-R
Before JOLLY, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The court has carefully considered this appeal in light
of the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent portions of the
record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law
in the district court’s disposition of this case. We also find
that the district court did not err or abuse its discretion in
regard to the challenged discovery rulings. Finally, Bergquist
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
raised no genuine issue of material fact concerning whether the
Bordelon firm represented FyBX Corporation at any time after
February 15, 1996, when Arata left the firm. Accordingly, we
AFFIRM the judgment for essentially the reasons stated by the
district court.
The motion of Appellee FyBX Corporation for sanctions and
costs is DENIED.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS DENIED.
2