Norton v. Monks

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 567