David v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.