La Van Allen v. Allen

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the later acts of the Legislature have left unchanged the rule adopted by this court in Schultz v. Schultz (89 N.Y. 644).

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ.; POUND, J., dissents in opinion, in which ANDREWS, J., concurs.