Motion for reargument of motion to dismiss appeal denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements. The order of reversal by the Appellate Division was not an interlocutory order within section 590 of the Civil Practice Act.
In Re a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard
Related Cases
- In Re a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard
- In re Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard
- In re Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard
- In re Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 310 Riverside Boulevard
- In Re Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of Holders of Investments