Motion for re-argument and to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, without prejudice to the right of the railroad company to apply at Special Term for an extension of time beyond that provided in the judgment as entered, to enable it to comply with the provisions of the same. (See 232 N.Y. 309.)
City of Mount Vernon v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Related Cases
- City of Mount Vernon v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
- Matter of New York, New Haven and Hartford R.R. Co.
- People ex rel. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Board of Railroad Commissioners
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
- Keirns v. . New York and Harlem Railroad Company