United States v. Flores-Iglesias

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date filed: 2004-08-18
Citations: 105 F. App'x 632
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                             FILED
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS      August 18, 2004
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                       Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                               Clerk

                            No. 04-40217
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE SAMUEL FLORES-IGLESIAS,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. B-99-CR-99-ALL
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for

Jose Samuel Flores-Iglesias (“Flores”), has moved for leave to

withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).    Flores has received a

copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 04-40217
                               -2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.