2. Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's claim pursuant Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that plaintiff has failed to allege specific acts or omissions of negligence on the part of a State employee or agent; that plaintiff's claim is barred due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and that plaintiff's claim is frivolous.
3. Based upon the face of plaintiff's pleading, plaintiff has failed to make a claim for negligence upon which relief can be granted, and that plaintiff's claim should be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim.
2. Under the provisions of the Tort Claims Act, negligence is determined by the same rules applicable to private parties. Bolkir v.N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706, 709, 365 S.E.2d 898, 900 (1988).
3. Plaintiff in his affidavit failed to show that the Industrial Commission has subject matter jurisdiction over his claims pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-291(a). *Page 3
enters the following:
2. No costs are taxed as plaintiff was permitted to file this civil action in forma pauperis.
This 31st day of August, 2007.
S/____________________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
*Page 1S/____________________________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN
S/____________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER